Efficient Resource Allocation Management in Multicommodity Networks: A Fuzzy Multiobjective Approach

Authors

  • Mohabat Ghanadzadeh Department of Mathematics, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran.
  • Babak Khabiri Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Jouybar Branch, Jouybar, Iran.
  • Vajiheh Imani Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22105/zev39s65

Keywords:

Fuzzy multiobjective solid minimal cost flow problem‎, LR flat fuzzy number‎, Multicommodity ‎minimal ‎cost ‎flow ‎problem‎

Abstract

This study delves into the complexities of a multi-objective minimal cost flow (MMCF) problem, focusing on the intricacies of transporting a variety of commodities from multiple sources to their intended destinations. The investigation recognizes the presence of several transportation alternatives, each with its distinctive capacity constraints tailored to the specific requirements of each commodity being moved. In addressing this transportation and distribution challenge, the study acknowledges that the resulting model may not inherently achieve a state of balance between the supply and demand across the network. To tackle this issue, a novel method is proposed that effectively solves the MMCF problem directly, circumventing the need for balance by not requiring the model's conversion to a balanced state. Furthermore, the research offers a thorough discussion on the advantages of the proposed solution method. These benefits are dissected in terms of efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and scalability, providing valuable insights into their applicability for complex logistical operations. The method's potential for adaptability in various operational contexts is also scrutinized, demonstrating its versatility in managing the multi-faceted dimensions of multi-commodity flow problems. By not adhering to the traditional balanced model requirement, the study breaks new ground, proposing an approach that could potentially streamline operations and lead to more sophisticated models and algorithms in the field of multi-objective optimization. The research opens avenues for further exploration into cost-efficient, capacity-conscious transport strategies that could redefine logistical practices.

References

‎[1] ‎Magnanti, T. L., & Orlin, J. B. (1993). Network flows. PHI, Englewood Cliffs NJ. Library of Congress ‎Publications.‎

‎[2] ‎Hamacher, H. W., Pedersen, C. R., & Ruzika, S. (2007). Multiple objective minimum cost flow problems: ‎a review. European journal of operational research, 176(3), 1404–1422. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221705008544‎

‎[3] ‎Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338–353. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001999586590241X

‎[4] ‎Zimmermann, H. J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective ‎functions. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1(1), 45–55. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165011478900313‎

‎[5] ‎Shih, H. S., & Lee, E. S. (1999). Fuzzy multi-level minimum cost flow problems. Fuzzy sets and systems, ‎‎107(2), 159–176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011497003679‎

‎[6] ‎Ammar, E. E., & Youness, E. A. (2005). Study on multiobjective transportation problem with fuzzy ‎numbers. Applied mathematics and computation, 166(2), 241–253. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300304004333‎

‎[7] ‎Gupta, A., Kumar, A., & Kaur, A. (2012). Mehar’s method to find exact fuzzy optimal solution of ‎unbalanced fully fuzzy multi-objective transportation problems. Optimization letters, 6(8), 1737–1751. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0367-2‎

‎[8] ‎Kaur, M., & Kumar, A. (2013). Optimal compromise solution of multi-objective minimal cost flow ‎problems in fuzzy environment. Applied mathematical modelling, 37(4), 1677–1693. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X12002715‎

‎[9] ‎Kaur, M., & Kumar, A. (2013). Method for solving unbalanced fully fuzzy multi-objective solid minimal ‎cost flow problems. Applied intelligence, 38(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0368-6‎

‎[10] ‎Bit, A. K., Biswal, M. P., & Alam, S. S. (1993). Fuzzy programming approach to multiobjective solid ‎transportation problem. Fuzzy sets and systems, 57(2), 183–194. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016501149390158E

‎[11] ‎Basu, M. (2004). An interactive fuzzy satisfying method based on evolutionary programming technique ‎for multiobjective short-term hydrothermal scheduling. Electric power systems research, 69(2), 277–285. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877960300244X

‎[12] ‎Yinzhen, L., Kenichi, I., & Mitsuo, G. (1997). Improved genetic algorithm for solving multiobjective ‎solid transportation problem with fuzzy numbers. Journal of japan society for fuzzy theory and systems, 9(2), ‎‎239–250. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jfuzzy/9/2/9_KJ00002088901/_article/-char/ja/‎

‎[13] ‎Ojha, A., Das, B., Mondal, S., & Maiti, M. (2009). An entropy based solid transportation problem for ‎general fuzzy costs and time with fuzzy equality. Mathematical and computer modelling, 50(1), 166–178. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii S0895717709001186‎

‎[14] ‎Melina, S., Napitupulu, H., & Mohamed, N. (2023). A conceptual model of investment-risk prediction in ‎the stock market using extreme value theory with machine learning: a semisystematic literature ‎review. Risks, 11(3), 60. DOI:10.3390/risks11030060‎

‎[15] ‎Chakraborty, D., Jana, D. K., & Roy, T. K. (2014). Multi-objective multi-item solid transportation ‎problem with fuzzy inequality constraints. Journal of inequalities and applications, 2014(1), 338. ‎https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-338‎

‎[16] ‎Dalman, H., Güzel, N., & Sivri, M. (2016). A fuzzy set-based approach to multi-objective multi-item ‎solid transportation problem under uncertainty. International journal of fuzzy systems, 18(4), 716–729. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-015-0081-9‎

‎[17] ‎Kundu, P., Kar, S., & Maiti, M. (2013). Multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem in fuzzy ‎environment. Applied mathematical modelling, 37(4), 2028–2038. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X12002570‎

‎[18] ‎Mahmud, M., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2021). A contingency theory perspective of environmental ‎management: empirical evidence from entrepreneurial firms. Journal of general management, 47(1), 3–17.‎

‎[19] ‎Rommelfanger, H. (1996). Fuzzy linear programming and applications. European journal of operational ‎research, 92(3), 512–527. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377221795000089‎

‎[20] ‎Dubois, D. J. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Elsevier Science.‎

‎[21] ‎Dehghan, M., Hashemi, B., & Ghatee, M. (2006). Computational methods for solving fully fuzzy linear ‎systems. Applied mathematics and computation, 179(1), 328–343. ‎https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300305010404‎

‎[22] ‎Socorro Garcia, M., & Teresa Lamata, M. (2007). A modification of the index of liou and wang for ‎ranking fuzzy number. International journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems, 15(04), ‎‎411–424. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004765‎

‎[23] ‎Fazeli, V. M. ., & Asgari, M. H. (2023). The impact of sensory marketing on customer loyalty in the ‎iranian clothing brand industry: with an emphasis on the sensory marketing mix. Journal of ‎interdisciplinary studies in marketing management, 1(3), 43–59.‎

‎[24] ‎Luc, D. T. (2016). Linear programming. In Multiobjective linear programming: an introduction (pp. 49–82). ‎Cham: springer international publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21091-9_3‎

Published

2024-04-20

How to Cite

Efficient Resource Allocation Management in Multicommodity Networks: A Fuzzy Multiobjective Approach. (2024). Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.22105/zev39s65