Critical Analysis of Phenomenological Research Design in a Qualitative Research Method

Authors

  • Adetayo Olaniyi Adeniran * Department of Logistics and Transport Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria‎. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6870-1212
  • Oluwadamisi Tayo-Ladega‎ Bangor University, United Kingdom.

https://doi.org/10.22105/ad338t15

Abstract

The research method and design have close relationships and are contained in each other. This study critically analyses phenomenological research design in a qualitative research method, intending to expose scholars in management, humanities, business, and social sciences to the dynamics of qualitative research methods and phenomenological research design, especially when conducting phenomenological research. A qualitative phenomenological research design is used to describe previous and present experiences of participants. This study further explains the research design, data collection methods, sample size, data analysis techniques, and roles of researcher, among other areas within the qualitative phenomenological research design, such that the outcome of qualitative phenomenological research will be credible, trustworthy, and dependable.

Keywords:

Phenomenology, Research design, Research method, Qualitative research

References

  1. [1] Adeniran, A. (2018). Establishing chi square as a non-parametric test in descriptive statistics. Science & ‎technology, 4, 106–113. https://encr.pw/4wV8B

  2. [2] Wagner, W. E., & Zaino, J. (2018). Adventures in social research: data analysis using IBM SPSS statistics ‎‎(10th ed.). SAGE publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=NtE_DwAAQBAJ

  3. [3] Skidmore, Shalonda., Kowalczyk, Devin., Scalia, S. (2020). Definition, purpose & types. Psychology 105: ‎research methods in psychology. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-research-definition-‎purpose-typical-researchers.html

  4. [4] University of Newcastle library guides. (2020). Research methods: what are research methods? ‎https://libguides.newcastle.edu.au/researchmethods

  5. [5] Shona, M. (2020). An introduction to research methods. SCRIBBR. ‎https://www.scribbr.com/category/methodology/

  6. [6] Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). Sage publications. ‎https://books.google.com/books?id=6DwmDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

  7. [7] ‎Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches ‎‎(4th ed.). Sage publications. ‎https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Inquiry_and_Research_Design.html?id=Pz5RvgAACAAJ

  8. [8] Vamsi Krishna Jasti, N., & Kodali, R. (2014). A literature review of empirical research methodology in ‎lean manufacturing. International journal of operations & production management, 34(8), 1080–1122. DOI: ‎‎10.1108/IJOPM-04-2012-0169‎

  9. [9] Stone, D. N., & Miller, T. C. (2012). The state of, and prospects for, forensic and fraud research that ‎matters. Journal of forensic & investigative accounting, 4(2), 35–76. http://web.nacva.com/JFIA/Issues/JFIA-‎‎2012-2_2.pdf‎

  10. [10] Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods ‎designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. DOI: 10.1111/1475-‎‎6773.12117‎

  11. [11] McCombes, S. (2019). How to create a research design. SCRIBBR. https://www.scribbr.com/research-‎process/research-design.‎

  12. [12] Vohra, V. (2014). Using the multiple case study design to decipher contextual leadership behaviors in ‎Indian organizations. Electronic journal of business research methods, 12(1), 54-65. https://academic-‎publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1314‎

  13. [13] Brown, D. J., & Lord, R. G. (1999). The utility of experimental research in the study of ‎transformational/charismatic leadership. The leadership quarterly, 10(4), 531–539. DOI: 10.1016/S1048-‎‎9843(99)00029-6‎

  14. [14] Keskinocak, P., & Tayur, S. (2001). Quantitative analysis for internet-enabled supply chains. Interfaces, ‎‎31(2), 70–89. DOI: 10.1287/inte.31.2.70.10626‎

  15. [15] Egan, T. M. (2005). Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: an examination of ‎quantitative empirical research. Advances in developing human resources, 7(2), 160–181. DOI: ‎‎10.1177/1523422305274527‎

  16. [16] Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2th ed.). Sage ‎publications. https://encr.pw/7ERhH

  17. [17] ‎Berríos, R., & Lucca, N. (2006). Qualitative methodology in counseling research: recent contributions ‎and challenges for a new century. Journal of counseling & development, 84(2), 174–186. DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-‎‎6678.2006.tb00393.x‎

  18. [18] ‎Rudkin, K. M., & Deo, H. N. (2006). Ethnographic methodology and its implications for banking ‎studies. Journal of the american academy of business, Cambridge, 6(2), 20–25. ‎https://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/1845/‎

  19. [19] ‎Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2013). Research methods, design, and analysis (12. ed). ‎https://dokumen.pub/research-methods-design-and-analysis-12-ed-global-ed-9780205961252-‎‎1292057742-9781292057743-0205961258.html‎

  20. [20] ‎Gilmore, D. (2002). Understanding and overcoming resistance to ethnographic design research. ‎Interactions, 9(3), 29–35. DOI: 10.1145/506671.506686‎

  21. [21] Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of ‎three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European journal of marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308. DOI: ‎‎10.1108/03090560510581782‎

  22. [22] Herek, G. M., Janis, I. L., & Huth, P. (1987). Decision making during international crises: is quality of ‎process related to outcome? Journal of conflict resolution, 31(2), 203–226. DOI: ‎‎10.1177/0022002787031002001‎

  23. [23] Selden, L. (2005). On grounded theory-with some malice. Journal of documentation, 61(1), 114–129. DOI: ‎‎10.1108/00220410510578041‎

  24. [24] Woodside, A. G., & Wilson, E. J. (2003). Case study research methods for theory building. Journal of ‎business & industrial marketing, 18(6/7), 493–508. DOI: 10.1108/08858620310492374‎

  25. [25] Budd, J. M. (2005). Phenomenology and information studies. Journal of documentation, 61(1), 44–59. DOI: ‎‎10.1108/00220410510578005‎

  26. [26] Küpers, W. (2005). Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of knowledge ‎management, 9(6), 114–133. DOI: 10.1108/13673270510630006‎

  27. [27] Nemati, S., Rassouli, M., Ilkhani, M., & Baghestani, A. R. (2018). Perceptions of family caregivers of ‎cancer patients about the challenges of caregiving: a qualitative study. Scandinavian journal of caring ‎sciences, 32(1), 309–316. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12463‎

  28. [28] Schumacher, L. A. (2010). The caregiver’s journey: a phenomenological study of the lived experience of leisure ‎for caregivers in the sandwich generation who care for a parent with dementia. [Thesis]. DOI: ‎‎10.17077/etd.g638o927‎

  29. [29] Wehei, M. (2018). Self-care for the caregiver. Harvard health blog. ‎https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/self-care-for-the-caregiver-2018101715003#:~‎

  30. [30] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE Publications. ‎https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Research_Evaluation_Methods.html?id=FjBw2oi8‎El4C

  31. [31] Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. ‎https://books.google.com/books?id=HB-VAgAAQBAJ

  32. [32] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). ‎Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation ‎research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42, 533–544. DOI: ‎‎10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

  33. [33] Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany research & ‎applications, 5, 147–158. DOI: 10125/227‎

  34. [34] Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (2nd ed.). SAGE ‎Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452226651‎

  35. [35] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). ‎John Wiley & Sons. https://acesse.dev/wFb0B

  36. [36] Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A ‎meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 129(6), 946–972. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946‎

  37. [37] Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: data collection, analysis, and management. The ‎canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231. DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456‎

  38. [38] Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using ‎trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of developmental education, 44(1), 26–28. ‎https://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095‎

  39. [39] Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative ‎tool structure is proposed. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64(1), 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008‎

  40. [40] Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to… assess the quality of qualitative research. The ‎clinical teacher, 17(6), 596–599. DOI: 10.1111/tct.13242‎

  41. [41] Bialon, L. N., & Coke, S. (2012). A study on caregiver burden: stressors, challenges, and possible ‎solutions. American journal of hospice and palliative medicine, 29(3), 210–218. DOI: ‎‎10.1177/1049909111416494‎

  42. [42] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE publications. ‎https://books.google.com/books?id=2oA9aWlNeooC

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Critical Analysis of Phenomenological Research Design in a Qualitative Research Method. (2024). Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1(2), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.22105/ad338t15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.