From Office to Online: Multi-Faceted Study of Remote Project Management Challenges and Adaptations
Abstract
Remote work, propelled by digital tools and changing employee expectations, has reshaped team dynamics. Yet project leaders still lack evidence-based guidance on which teams struggle, when, and why. We analyze the first cross-regional dataset linking project-level outcomes to individual well-being: reports from 79 project managers. The design is convergent mixed-methods. A two-level logistic regression explained 42% of the variance in deadline slippage and revealed a three-way interaction that raised the odds of remote-work failure by 3.7 (p < .01). Quantitative predictors included technical disruptions, time-zone coordination issues, communication barriers, work-life balance conflicts, home-office distractions, limited resource access, and cybersecurity threats. Qualitative evidence described adaptive practices and mitigation tactics. Organizations invested in digital infrastructure, adopted unified communications tools, used AI-assisted scheduling platforms, and provided continuous training. The study offers practical guidance to strengthen resilience, productivity, and sustainability in remote project teams while clarifying organizational implications of digital transformation.
Keywords:
Project management, Digital transformation, Organizational adaptation, Virtual collaboration, Virtual office cultureReferences
- [1] Research., G. (2024). Analysts: Jineh Ayati. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/5778815
- [2] Santos, R. E. D. S., & Ralph, P. (2022). A grounded theory of coordination in remote-first and hybrid software teams. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.10445
- [3] Wheatley, D., Broome, M. R., Dobbins, T., Hopkins, B., & Powell, O. (2024). Navigating choppy water: Flexibility ripple effects in the COVID-19 pandemic and the future of remote and hybrid working. Work, employment and society, 38(5), 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231195230
- [4] Lakshmi, V., Nigam, R., & Mishra, S. (2017). Telecommuting--A key driver to work-life balance and productivity. IOSR journal of business and management, 19(01), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1901032023
- [5] Yilmaz, A. A. (2024). The new work revolution: telecommuting, and flexibility rewrite the rules. The journal of social science, 8(16), 111–123. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1269665
- [6] Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International journal of information management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
- [7] Mariani, M., Wamba, S. F., Castaldo, S., & Santoro, G. (2023). The rise and consolidation of digital platforms and technologies for remote working: Opportunities, challenges, drivers, processes, and consequences. Journal of business research, 160, 113617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113617
- [8] Chen, Y., Cortes, P., Kosar, G., Pan, J., & Zafar, B. (2023). The impact of covid-19 on workers’ expectations and preferences for remote work. AEA papers and proceedings (Vol. 113, pp. 556–561). American Economic Association 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30941/w30941.pdf
- [9] Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. BRQ business research quarterly, 24(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211009528
- [10] Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2023). The evolution of work from home. Journal of economic perspectives, 37(4), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.4.23
- [11] Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2022). Working from home around the world. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2022(2), 281–360. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2022.a901274
- [12] Leonardi, P. M., Parker, S. H., & Shen, R. (2024). How remote work changes the world of work. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 11(1), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-091922-015852
- [13] Atoko, S. R. (2021). The impact of remote working on employee performance during the coronavirus (Covid19) pandemic. International journal of economics, commerce and management, 9(2), 369–383. https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/9223.pdf
- [14] Kitagawa, R., Kuroda, S., Okudaira, H., & Owan, H. (2021). Working from home and productivity under the COVID-19 pandemic: Using survey data of four manufacturing firms. PloS one, 16(12), e0261761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261761
- [15] Al-Habaibeh, A., Watkins, M., Waried, K., & Javareshk, M. B. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of remotely working from home during Covid-19 pandemic. Global transitions, 3, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2021.11.001
- [16] Pullokaran, L., & Joseph, P. (2023). Working remotely: employees benefits and challenges. International journal of engineering technology and management sciences, 7(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i01.007
- [17] Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Jordán, P. (2022). Virtual teams are here to stay: How personality traits, virtuality and leader gender impact trust in the leader and team commitment. European research on management and business economics, 28(2), 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100193
- [18] Cucolaş, A.-A., & Russo, D. (2023). The impact of working from home on the success of Scrum projects: A multi-method study. Journal of systems and software, 197, 111562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111562
- [19] Wöhrmann, A. M., Dilchert, N., & Michel, A. (2021). Working time flexibility and work-life balance. Zeitschrift für arbeitswissenschaft, 75(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-020-00230-x
- [20] Battisti, E., Alfiero, S., & Leonidou, E. (2022). Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees. Journal of business research, 150, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.010
- [21] Urrila, L., Siiriäinen, A., Mäkelä, L., & Kangas, H. (2025). Sense of belonging in hybrid work settings. Journal of vocational behavior, 157, 104096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104096
- [22] Bellis, P., Cunial, M., & Trabucchi, D. (2024). Mastering hybrid worlds through digital leadership: The role of agility in fostering innovation. Business horizons, 67(4), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.002
- [23] Höddinghaus, M., Nohe, C., & Hertel, G. (2024). Leadership in virtual work settings: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to do. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 33(2), 188–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2250079
- [24] Ertiö, T., Eriksson, T., Rowan, W., & McCarthy, S. (2024). The role of digital leaders’ emotional intelligence in mitigating employee technostress. Business horizons, 67(4), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.03.004
- [25] Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2022). Digitalization of project management: Opportunities in research and practice. Project leadership and society, 3, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100061
- [26] Jacks, T. (2021). Research on remote work in the era of COVID-19. Journal of global information technology management, 24(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2021.1914500
- [27] Angelucci, M., Angrisani, M., Bennett, D. M., Kapteyn, A., & Schaner, S. G. (2020). Remote work and the heterogeneous impact of COVID-19 on employment and health. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27749%0A
- [28] Beland, L.-P., Brodeur, A., & Wright, T. (2023). The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response. PLOS one, 18(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270341
- [29] Villamor, I., Hill, N. S., Kossek, E. E., & Foley, K. O. (2023). Virtuality at work: A doubled-edged sword for women’s career equality? Academy of management annals, 17(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0384
- [30] Stankevičiūtė, Ž., & Kunskaja, S. (2022). Strengthening of work-life balance while working remotely in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Human systems management, 41(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211511
- [31] Marhraoui, M. A. (2023). Digital skills for project managers: A systematic literature review. Procedia computer science, 219, 1591–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.451
- [32] Bednarz, A. L., Borkowska-Bierć, M., & Matejun, M. (2021). Managerial responses to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare organizations project management. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(22), 12082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212082
- [33] Rodoplu Şahin, D., Aslan, M., Demirkaya, H., & Ateşoğlu, H. (2022). The effect of COVID-19 on employees’ mental health. Scientific reports, 12(1), 15067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18692-w
- [34] Gonçalves, M. L. A., Penha, R., Silva, L. F., Martens, C. D. P., & Silva, V. F. (2023). The relationship between project management and digital transformation: Systematic literature review. RAM. revista de administração mackenzie, 24(4), eRAMR230075. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR230075.en
- [35] Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human resource management review, 27(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004
- [36] Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Grossmann, G., Ladjal, D., & Pardo, A. (2024). The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 19(3), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5
- [37] Reunamäki, R., & Fey, C. F. (2023). Remote agile: Problems, solutions, and pitfalls to avoid. Business horizons, 66(4), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.003
- [38] Froese, F. J., Blay, T., Gibson, C. B., Shaffer, M. A., & Benitez, J. (2025). Global virtual work: A review, integrative framework, and future research opportunities. Journal of international business studies, 56(6), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-025-00775-1
- [39] Tereso, A., Ribeiro, P., Fernandes, G., Loureiro, I., & Ferreira, M. (2019). Project management practices in private organizations. Project management journal, 50(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818810966
- [40] Fekry Youssef, M., Fathy Eid, A., & Mohamed Khodeir, L. (2023). Challenges affecting efficient management of virtual teams in construction in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ain shams engineering journal, 14(7), 102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.102008
- [41] De Jong, B., Gillespie, N., Williamson, I., & Gill, C. (2021). Trust consensus within culturally diverse teams: A multistudy investigation. Journal of management, 47(8), 2135–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320943658
- [42] Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee relations, 35(5), 527–546. http://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2012-0059
- [43] Blumberga, S., & Berga, S. (2022). Personnel loyalty, work–life balance during remote work. Proceedings of cbu in social sciences, 3, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v3.300
- [44] Marzolla, M. C., Borghans, L., Ebus, J., Gwiazda, M., van Heugten, C., & Hurks, P. (2024). The impact of noise exposure, time pressure, and cognitive load on objective task performance and subjective sensory overload and fatigue. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 46(10), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2458539
- [45] Škiljić, A. (2020). Cybersecurity and remote working: Croatia’s (non-)response to increased cyber threats. International cybersecurity law review, 1(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-020-00014-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Authors retain copyright and grant Management Analytics and Social Insights (MASI) the right of first publication. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated. Authors may deposit and share the published version of their article in institutional, subject, or other repositories and on personal or institutional websites.